20/10/2013
After the chaos and destruction of 'Downfall' and Traudl Junge's tearful admission of guilt, our season exploring the perpetrators now moves forward in history and turns to the Middle East. 'Waltz With Bashir' (2008) is a famous autobiographical film that tells the story of Israeli director Ari Folman's participation in the 1982 massacre of Sabra and Shatilla refugee camps as a teenager serving in the Israeli army.
Told mostly in fantasy flashback sequences, the film begins with the now middle-aged Folman who, while visiting a friend, is disturbed to discover that he has no memories of his activities, an attribute that a psychologist tells him is a form of post-traumatic stress disorder, a means of coping with extreme guilt. The film follows his attempt to regain his memories, through talking to fellow soldiers, historians and a TV reporter, to uncover the part he played in this now infamous massacre.
The film is a complex analysis of the psychology of the Israeli citizen, an individual who exists in a highly militarised society and is subject to extreme forms of state propaganda yet is nevertheless aware of the injustice they perpetrate. Such a situation (the film seems to suggest) results in a unique form of trauma that manifests itself in anger, nihilism, mental disturbance and extreme behaviour, resulting in a generation of damaged and conflicted individuals who, as we see in Folman's characters, approach their situation in various ways. Along with its unique form of animation, it is for its soundtrack that the film has also been heavily commended, which blends classical music, Trance tracks (which contemporary Israel is so famous for) and a host of anti-war songs.
This film picked up 40 international awards, including a Golden Globe, an Asia Pacific Screen Award (that's us!) and was nominated for the Palm d'Or at Cannes and an Oscar.
Our screening will explore the trauma of perpetration through three questions:
1. Like Traudl Junge, Folman did not play a direct role in the massacre - to what extent (as a citizen and a soldier) is he still responsible for the crimes of the state?
2. In the ending, Folman forces us to confront his guilt in a shocking way, one that contradicts and contests the previous sympathy we had built up for him - why do you think he does this?
3. In 'Downfall', Junge stated her final realisation that "youth is no excuse" for blindly following orders - do we think that this applies to Folman's case of forced national service?
All Welcome.